Purview Review

|

Yahoo News reports:

Describing the White House's concerns about access to the document, Bush said it is important "for the writers of the presidential daily brief to feel comfortable that the documents will never be politicized and/or unnecessarily exposed for public purview."

Of the many ways Mr. Bush has found to mangle the English language, his propensity to simply misuse words is probably the most irksome. Why use a word when you obviously don't know what it means? Why not just say 'review'? I just don't understand

Yahoo News reports:

Describing the White House's concerns about access to the document, Bush said it is important "for the writers of the presidential daily brief to feel comfortable that the documents will never be politicized and/or unnecessarily exposed for public purview."

Of the many ways Mr. Bush has found to mangle the English language, his propensity to simply misuse words is probably the most irksome. Why use a word when you obviously don't know what it means? Why not just say 'review'? I just don't understand

About

My name is Patrick Calahan.

I live in San Francisco.

I do product development and consulting on Java and Business Intelligence.

This is my blog.

Contact

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by published on November 13, 2003 12:00 PM.

Still At War Again? was the previous entry in this blog.

E.T. Poll Home is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01